
Analyzing midfield formations

I’m looking into the tactical formations in football. Argentina in 2022 experimented with 4-4-2 and 4-3-1-2, using players like Enzo Fernández and Messi in strategic roles. Real Madrid also embraced a diamond midfield with players like Bellingham under Ancelotti, while Liverpool shifted to a box midfield in 2023. Various Italian teams historically used similar formations, with some arguing that the diamond midfield is less common now but still around. Overall, there’s a lot of tactical diversity!Evaluating diamond formations

I'm analyzing the pros and cons of using a diamond formation in football. It offers great central control and pressing traps, though it can be vulnerable to switches in play and wing overloads. The modern game's focus on transitions can put high fullbacks at risk. Still, this formation suits teams looking to dominate the center and utilize verticality. Key personnel include energetic shuttlers, elite fullbacks, and mobile forwards. Teams like Real Madrid and Atalanta sometimes employ this strategy, adding to its current relevance.Analyzing tactical formations
I need to provide a concise tactical analysis in Chinese, focusing on the viability of various diamond formations, including examples and counterexamples. I want to include conditions for use, modern adaptations like asymmetrical diamond or hybrid diamond-box setups, and how these formations fit into build-up structures like the 3-2-2-3. Real Madrid utilized the diamond in 2023-24, while teams like Salzburg and River Plate under Gallardo have also done so in the past. I’ll include coach names and seasons to support this.Evaluating the diamond formation
I need to propose when to effectively use the diamond formation, particularly against teams with a double pivot or strong playmakers. It can congest the center and pin fullbacks, with triggers for pressing when the ball is passed to a fullback. The user mentioned "TA," possibly indicating a request for analysis. They claim the diamond formation is nearly extinct, but I want to gently disagree by presenting its rare use and modern adaptations. I’ll structure my response with concise bullet points, aiming for clarity. A final summary will wrap things up with a rule of thumb for viability.Analyzing the diamond formation
不太同意“几乎绝迹”。更准确是:纯正4-4-2菱形更少见了,但在合适人员与机制下仍是可行解,且有周期性回潮与混合体。

结论:菱形并未消失,只是门槛更高、对角色匹配和团队机制要求更苛刻。配合非对称与相位切换(构建期盒形、无球期菱形),依然能在现代强调边路与转换的环境下稳定运行。